Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R9 M375X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1015 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 343
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1564 vs 1333
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 vs 1333
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2185
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1015 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2185 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1808 vs 1594
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8103 vs 7093
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3548 vs 2652
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3548 vs 2652
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1808 vs 1594 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8103 vs 7093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 vs 2652 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1594 | 1808 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 343 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7093 | 8103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 3548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 3548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2185 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Tropo |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 873 | 874 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon 540
