AMD Radeon R9 M375X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • 225x more memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
  • Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8320 vs 7973
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 9 October 2012
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 8320 vs 7973

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

  • Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 40.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 1,299 gflops
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 1808
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 343
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 3548
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 3548
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1333
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1333
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2185
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2185
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 928 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate 59.2 billion / sec vs 40.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Floating-point performance 1,425 gflops vs 1,299 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2527 vs 1808
PassMark - G2D Mark 410 vs 343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3948 vs 3548
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3948 vs 3548
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3335 vs 2185
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3335 vs 2185

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1808
2527
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
343
410
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3548
3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3548
3948
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8320
7973
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1333
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1333
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2185
3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2185
3335
Name AMD Radeon R9 M375X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark 1808 2527
PassMark - G2D Mark 343 410
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3548 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3548 3948
Geekbench - OpenCL 8320 7973
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1333 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1333 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2185 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2185 3335
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 47.404
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 881

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M375X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Tropo GK106
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 9 October 2012
Place in performance rating 874 876
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Price now $169.99
Value for money (0-100) 18.72

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1015 MHz
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 925 MHz 928 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,299 gflops 1,425 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 768
Texture fill rate 40.6 GTexel / s 59.2 billion / sec
Transistor count 1,500 million 2,540 million
CUDA cores 768
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini...
Eyefinity
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB / s 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz 5.4 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA