AMD Radeon R9 M375X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R9 M375X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
225x more memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8103 vs 7979

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 9 October 2012
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	8103 vs 7979

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 40.6 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 1,299 gflops
Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2528 vs 1808
Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 343
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 3548
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 3548
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1333
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1333
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2185
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2185

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	928 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate	59.2 billion / sec vs 40.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Floating-point performance	1,425 gflops vs 1,299 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2528 vs 1808
PassMark - G2D Mark	411 vs 343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3948 vs 3548
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3948 vs 3548
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3335 vs 2185
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3335 vs 2185

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1808

2528

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

343

411

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3548

3948

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3548

3948

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8103

7979

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1333

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1333

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2185

3335

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2185

3335

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M375X	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	1808	2528
PassMark - G2D Mark	343	411
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3548	3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3548	3948
Geekbench - OpenCL	8103	7979
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1333	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1333	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2185	3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2185	3335
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		47.404
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		881

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M375X	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tropo	GK106
Design	AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date	5 May 2015	9 October 2012
Place in performance rating	876	878
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$169.99
Value for money (0-100)		18.72
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1015 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz	928 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,299 gflops	1,425 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	768
Texture fill rate	40.6 GTexel / s	59.2 billion / sec
Transistor count	1,500 million	2,540 million
CUDA cores		768
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		110 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini...
Eyefinity
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		One 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA