AMD Radeon R9 M375X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 225x more memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8320 vs 7973
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 9 October 2012 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8320 vs 7973 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 40.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 1,299 gflops
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 1808
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 343
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 3548
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 3548
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1333
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1333
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2185
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2185
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 40.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 1,299 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 vs 1808 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 vs 343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 vs 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 vs 3548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 2185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 2185 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1808 | 2527 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 410 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 | 3948 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8320 | 7973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2185 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2185 | 3335 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M375X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tropo | GK106 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 9 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 874 | 876 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 928 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | 1,425 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | 59.2 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
Eyefinity | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |