AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 360 MHz
- 16.7x more texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 768 vs 16
- 66.7x better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 33x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2771 vs 84
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 529 vs 385
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2855 vs 628
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2855 vs 628
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 12 September 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 360 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 vs 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 vs 385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 vs 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 vs 628 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 | 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 628 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Strato | G84 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 12 September 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 863 | 861 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Price now | $92.75 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 360 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 289 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M380 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
