AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,425 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 300x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2763 vs 2522
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 528 vs 408
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12839 vs 7902
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 vs 23.168
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 vs 2.141
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 vs 28.29
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 vs 47.404
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 9 October 2012 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 1,425 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2763 vs 2522 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 528 vs 408 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12839 vs 7902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 vs 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 vs 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 vs 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 vs 47.404 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 546.907
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 3688
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2855
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 3688
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2855
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 vs 546.907 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 vs 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 vs 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 2855 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2763 | 2522 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 528 | 408 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12839 | 7902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | 592.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | 47.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Strato | GK106 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 9 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 863 | 865 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,425 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 59.2 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M380 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X300
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GS AGP
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
