AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,425 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 300x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 vs 2527
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 410
• Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12660 vs 7973
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 vs 23.168
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 vs 2.141
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 vs 28.29
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 vs 47.404

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 546.907
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 3688
• 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 536
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2855
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 3688
• 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 536
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2855

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2774 2527
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	530 410
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12660 7973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.701 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	546.907 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.618 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.878 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.051 47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 3335

Compare specifications (specs)