AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385X and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49760 vs 22410
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3339
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3339
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 24 April 2012
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 49760 vs 22410
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 vs 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3339

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M

  • Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 68 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 43% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 896
  • Around 10% better floating-point performance: 2,176 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
  • 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5094 vs 4079
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5094 vs 4079
  • Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 506 vs 267
  • Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3529 vs 1994
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 68 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 896
Floating-point performance 2,176 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5094 vs 4079
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5094 vs 4079
PassMark - G2D Mark 506 vs 267
PassMark - G3D Mark 3529 vs 1994

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4079
5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4079
5094
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
267
506
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1994
3529
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
49760
22410
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3692
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3339
Name AMD Radeon R9 M385X AMD Radeon HD 7970M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4079 5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4079 5094
PassMark - G2D Mark 267 506
PassMark - G3D Mark 1994 3529
Geekbench - OpenCL 49760 22410
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 51.181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1121.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 81.527
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 256.99
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M385X AMD Radeon HD 7970M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Strato Wimbledon
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 24 April 2012
Place in performance rating 563 590
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,971 gflops 2,176 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 896 1280
Texture fill rate 61.6 GTexel / s 68 GTexel / s
Transistor count 2,080 million 2,800 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB / s 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz 4800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DirectCompute 5.0
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore