AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 590
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23551 vs 23233
  • Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.535 vs 37.407
  • Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.811 vs 174.323
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 23 May 2013
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 715 vs 590
Geekbench - OpenCL 23551 vs 23233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 65.535 vs 37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 336.811 vs 174.323

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 834 MHz
  • Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 93.41 GTexel / s
  • Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
  • Around 39% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2,989 gflops
  • Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5460 MHz
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 vs 4916
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 57.735 vs 56.272
  • Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 778.867
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.505 vs 5.051
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 863 MHz vs 834 MHz
Texture fill rate 160.5 billion / sec vs 93.41 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 1792
Floating-point performance 4,156 gflops vs 2,989 gflops
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 5460 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7986 vs 4916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 57.735 vs 56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1269.688 vs 778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.505 vs 5.051

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
715
590
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4916
7986
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
23551
23233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
56.272
57.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
778.867
1269.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.051
5.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
65.535
37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
336.811
174.323
Name AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
PassMark - G2D Mark 715 590
PassMark - G3D Mark 4916 7986
Geekbench - OpenCL 23551 23233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 56.272 57.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 778.867 1269.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.051 5.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 65.535 37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 336.811 174.323
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2777

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Kepler
Code name Grenada GK110
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 23 May 2013
Place in performance rating 448 451
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $649
Price now $740.99
Value for money (0-100) 12.94

Technical info

Core clock speed 834 MHz 863 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,989 gflops 4,156 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1792 2304
Texture fill rate 93.41 GTexel / s 160.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 6,200 million 7,080 million
Boost clock speed 900 MHz
CUDA cores 2304
Maximum GPU temperature 95 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Minimum recommended system power 600 Watt

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 174.7 GB / s 288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5460 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
TrueAudio
ZeroCore
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
PhysX
TXAA