NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 834 MHz
746.4x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6222 vs 4916
Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36290 vs 23551
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.465 vs 56.272
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1047.553 vs 778.867
Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 vs 5.051
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 vs 65.535
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 346.529 vs 336.811

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2019 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 834 MHz
Texture fill rate	69.72 GTexel/s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6222 vs 4916
Geekbench - OpenCL	36290 vs 23551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	129.465 vs 56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1047.553 vs 778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.88 vs 5.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	78.563 vs 65.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	346.529 vs 336.811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
2.7x more memory clock speed: 5460 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 326

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1792 vs 896
Memory clock speed	5460 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	715 vs 326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6222

4916

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

326

715

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36290

23551

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

129.465

56.272

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1047.553

778.867

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.88

5.051

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

78.563

65.535

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

346.529

336.811

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark	6222	4916
PassMark - G2D Mark	326	715
Geekbench - OpenCL	36290	23551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	129.465	56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1047.553	778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.88	5.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	78.563	65.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	346.529	336.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2954

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 2.0
Code name	TU117	Grenada
Launch date	23 April 2019	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	447	448
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	834 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	69.72 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.462 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.231 TFLOPS
Pipelines	896	1792
Pixel fill rate	39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	69.72 GTexel/s	93.41 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	6,200 million
Floating-point performance		2,989 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	174.7 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	5460 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
TrueAudio
ZeroCore