AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W7100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and AMD FirePro W7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 400 Watt
• Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 5460 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 663

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 920 MHz vs 834 MHz
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 103.0 GTexel / s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 3,297 gflops vs 2,989 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5191 vs 4916
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24892 vs 23551
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.781 vs 56.272
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1248.285 vs 778.867
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.854 vs 5.051
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.086 vs 65.535
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 361.58 vs 336.811

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7100

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	715 663
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4916 5191
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	23551 24892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.272 65.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	778.867 1248.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.051 5.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.535 94.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	336.811 361.58

Compare specifications (specs)