AMD Radeon R9 M470 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2331 vs 1968
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 33977
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 30 September 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2331 vs 1968 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 vs 33977 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 52.2 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 1440 vs 768
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 2,088.0 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 307
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1804
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1674
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 52.2 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1440 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,088.0 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 vs 307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2331 | 1968 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 410 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 | 33977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1804 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1804 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.467 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.541 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3806 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3806 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M470 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Strato | Cypress |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 30 September 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 767 | 764 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1440 |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,154 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M470 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M470 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
AMDRadeon R9 M470 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon R9 M470 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon R9 M470 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon R9 M470 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
AMDRadeon R9 M470 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
