AMD Radeon R9 M470X vs AMD FirePro W4300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470X and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3244 vs 2818
- 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57109 vs 10312
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 1 December 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 1,428 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3244 vs 2818 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57109 vs 10312 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 426
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3715
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3715
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3359
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3359
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M470X | AMD FirePro W4300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3244 | 2818 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6161 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57109 | 10312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 17597 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 17597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.528 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.985 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.153 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 152.484 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3572 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M470X | AMD FirePro W4300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Strato | Bonaire |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 1 December 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 460 | 416 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 930 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 171 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |