AMD Radeon R9 M470X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 837 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57109 vs 23870
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 19 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 837 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57109 vs 23870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- 3x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 2688 vs 896
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 vs 3244
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 426
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 1,971 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 vs 3244 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 vs 426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M470X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3244 | 8190 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57109 | 23870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M470X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Strato | GK110 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 19 February 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 460 | 428 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 4,709 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2688 |
| Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M470X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
ATIRadeon X700 SE
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
ATIFireGL V7200
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 Max-Q
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
AMDRadeon R9 M470X vs
AppleM2 Pro 16-core
