AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 975 MHz
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1013 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 versus 410
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 68.443
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 18 August 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 975 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1013 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 versus 410 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 68.443 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 78 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 1,280 versus 896
- 1134.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,496 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6143 versus 4102
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19918 versus 17594
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 versus 55
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.338 versus 970.421
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.157 versus 4.656
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.464 versus 237.944
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7602 versus 6821
- 65.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7602 versus 115.4
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1,280 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,496 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6143 versus 4102 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19918 versus 17594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 versus 55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 versus 970.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 versus 4.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 versus 237.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 versus 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 versus 115.4 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4102 | 6143 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 410 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17594 | 19918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 81.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 1235.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 6.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 68.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 251.464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | 7602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | 7602 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | 0 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GM204 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 565 | 567 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1013 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 2,496 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1,280 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.2 GTexel / s | 78 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 170 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
ATIFireMV 2250
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P600
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAP104-100
