AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 66.08 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 1400x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- 7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 vs 9298
- Around 65% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1730 vs 1050
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 vs 34.239
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 vs 639.427
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.656 vs 2.341
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 vs 32
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 vs 69.814
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 66.08 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 vs 9298 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 vs 1050 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 vs 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 vs 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 vs 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 vs 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 vs 69.814 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 505x better floating-point performance: 1,111 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 70 Watt
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 70 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 | 9298 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | 1050 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 69.814 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3339 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 512 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Baffin | GM107 |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $119 |
| Place in performance rating | 692 | 747 |
| Price now | $179.50 | $150.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.72 | 27.54 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Compute units | 14 | |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | 1,111 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 512 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Texture fill rate | 66.08 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) with others
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
ATIRadeon X700
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1800
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
