AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 154.4 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 vs 76.687
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 890.785
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 28.659
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 26 November 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz vs 1201 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 vs 76.687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 890.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 28.659 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 926 MHz
- 502x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 6600 MHz
Core clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 6600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 76.687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 890.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 28.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | GM206 |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 26 November 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Place in performance rating | 389 | 978 |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | 1201 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 2,460 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s | 76.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 2,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 112.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 7012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |