AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon E8870
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon E8870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2650x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 4620
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 4620
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4307 vs 3368
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 29 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 4620 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 vs 3368 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 708 vs 367
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 vs 3695
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 vs 3695
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 vs 3353
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 vs 367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon E8870 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 4620 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35118 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 708 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4307 | 3368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 5030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 5030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 18191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 18191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.11 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon E8870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Saturn |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 29 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 383 | 341 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |