AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 30 April 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1445 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9813
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9813
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 36319
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 390
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 4724
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3695
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1445 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 9813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 9813 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 36319 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 390 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 4724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 10959 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36319 | 39165 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | 564 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4724 | 7881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU107 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 384 | 376 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5300M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1900
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
ATIFireGL V7700
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850 X2
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon RX 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
