AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1245 MHz
Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s
Around 57% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 896
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 8824
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 8824
Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 326

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 23 April 2019
Core clock speed	1036 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz vs 1245 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s
Pipelines	1408 vs 896
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813 vs 8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813 vs 8824
Geekbench - OpenCL	36319 vs 36290
PassMark - G2D Mark	390 vs 326
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3352

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 85 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6222 vs 4724

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 85 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6222 vs 4724
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707 vs 3695

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

8824

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

8824

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36319

36290

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

390

326

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4724

6222

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3352

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3352

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813	8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813	8824
Geekbench - OpenCL	36319	36290
PassMark - G2D Mark	390	326
PassMark - G3D Mark	4724	6222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		129.465
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1047.553
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		78.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		346.529
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2954

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 14	TU117
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	23 April 2019
Place in performance rating	384	447
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz	1245 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1036 MHz	1020 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)	69.72 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)	4.462 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.069 TFLOPS	2.231 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	896
Pixel fill rate	46.24 GPixel/s	39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s	69.72 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	4700 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	96 Bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5