AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1178 MHz
1167x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 148 Watt
2000x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36319 vs 28516

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 19 September 2014
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz vs 1178 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 148 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	36319 vs 28516
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1036 MHz
Around 18% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1408
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 9813
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 9813
Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 403
Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9635 vs 5045

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1050 MHz vs 1036 MHz
Pipelines	1664 vs 1408
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11499 vs 9813
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11499 vs 9813
PassMark - G2D Mark	766 vs 403
PassMark - G3D Mark	9635 vs 5045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 3695

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

11499

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

11499

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36319

28516

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

403

766

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5045

9635

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3340

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813	11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813	11499
Geekbench - OpenCL	36319	28516
PassMark - G2D Mark	403	766
PassMark - G3D Mark	5045	9635
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		8.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		489.884
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		362

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 14	GM204
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	19 September 2014
Place in performance rating	381	378
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$329
Price now		$407.76
Value for money (0-100)		28.59
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz	1178 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1036 MHz	1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	1664
Pixel fill rate	46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s	109 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	148 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	5,200 million
CUDA cores		1664
Floating-point performance		3,920 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		98 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pins
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		500 Watt
SLI options		4x
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.0 GB/s	224 GB / s
Memory bus width	96 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround