AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1216 MHz
  • 883.3x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 144 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 165 Watt
  • 2000x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 9566
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 9566
  • Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36319 vs 34898
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3335
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3335
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 vs 19 September 2014
Boost clock speed 1445 MHz vs 1216 MHz
Texture fill rate 127.2 GTexel/s vs 144 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 165 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9813 vs 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9813 vs 9566
Geekbench - OpenCL 36319 vs 34898
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3695 vs 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3695 vs 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

  • Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 403
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11113 vs 5045
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2048 vs 1408
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 791 vs 403
PassMark - G3D Mark 11113 vs 5045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9813
9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9813
9566
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
36319
34898
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
403
791
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5045
11113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3695
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3695
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3335
Name AMD Radeon RX 5300M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9813 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9813 9566
Geekbench - OpenCL 36319 34898
PassMark - G2D Mark 403 791
PassMark - G3D Mark 5045 11113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3695 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3695 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3335
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 110.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1348.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 477.015
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 475

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5300M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Navi 14 GM204
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 19 September 2014
Place in performance rating 381 379
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $549
Price now $605.06
Value for money (0-100) 21.18

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1445 MHz 1216 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1036 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 2048
Pixel fill rate 46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 127.2 GTexel/s 144 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 165 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 5,200 million
CUDA cores 2048
Floating-point performance 4,981 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support
VGA аnalog display support 1

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pins
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 500 Watt
SLI options 1

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 168.0 GB/s 224 GB / s
Memory bus width 96 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
BatteryBoost
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
Surround