Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2688 vs 1857
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12203 vs 9416
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 2296
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 2296
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2688 vs 1857 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12203 vs 9416 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 2296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 2296 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 354
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2688 | 1857 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12203 | 9416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 2296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 2296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 621 | 623 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Compute units | 48 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | 19.50 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 39.01 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
