AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 85 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6500 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 460
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 815.354

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• 1344.2x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 2690
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14269 vs 11610
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.283 vs 33.507
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.437 vs 3.064
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.718 vs 52.533
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.258 vs 140.911
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 940
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2158
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 940
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 3032
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 460
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 14269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 63.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 171.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3340

Compare specifications (specs)