AMD Radeon RX 550 versus AMD Radeon R9 M380
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD Radeon R9 M380 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1183 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 546.907
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 2.618
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 48.878
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 3688
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 940 versus 536
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 3688
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 940 versus 536
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 5 May 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 546.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 2.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 48.878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 versus 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 versus 536 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M380
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 48 GTexel / s versus 37.86 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 512
- 1280x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 versus 2732
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 versus 484
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12660 versus 11662
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 versus 33.507
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 versus 140.911
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2855 versus 2158
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2855 versus 2158
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s versus 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 versus 2732 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 versus 484 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12660 versus 11662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 versus 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 versus 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 versus 2158 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M380
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2732 | 2774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 | 530 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11662 | 12660 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 34.701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 546.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 2.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 48.878 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 194.051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 2855 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1199 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Lexa | Strato |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 873 | 875 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 900 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,536 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 2,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore |