AMD Radeon RX 550 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 3.1x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 8.2x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 25.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 20
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 524
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 275
• 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 2143
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 7.844
• 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 154.696
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 0.958
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 9.084
• 16.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 8.335
• 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 817
• 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 817

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• 38.3x better floating-point performance: 46 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 940
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2158
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 940
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2158
• Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 152 vs 127

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	127 152

Compare specifications (specs)