AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
- 4.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 112
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 7.8x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 454
- 8.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 56
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 21 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 512 vs 112 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 454 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 56 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 280x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 940
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 2158
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 940
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 2158
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3304 vs 2158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 454 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 56 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3304 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Lexa | G92 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 21 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $160 |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 1063 |
Price now | $75 | $103.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | 8.86 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 336.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |