AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 457
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 799.414
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 30.523
- Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 127 vs 122
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 30.523 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 vs 122 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1183 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- 1551.7x better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 2690
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 11610
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 33.507
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.064
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 140.911
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 4485
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 940
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2158
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 4485
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 940
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2158
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1183 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 2690 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 vs 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 vs 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 2158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 5029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Lexa | GP107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $109 |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 586 |
Price now | $75 | $124.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | 56.95 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,862 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | 300 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |