AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 550 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 550
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 50% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 457
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 799.414
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 30.523
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 127 vs 122
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 18 April 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 30.523 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 vs 122 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1290 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Etwa 18% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1392 MHz vs 1183 MHz
- Etwa 54% höhere Texturfüllrate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- Etwa 25% höhere Leitungssysteme: 640 vs 512
- 1551.7x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,862 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 2690
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 11610
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 33.507
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.064
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 140.911
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 4485
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 940
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2158
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 4485
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 940
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2158
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1290 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1392 MHz vs 1183 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 640 vs 512 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,862 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7008 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 2690 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 vs 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 vs 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 2158 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 5029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 122 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Codename | Lexa | GP107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
Startdatum | 18 April 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $79 | $109 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 876 | 586 |
Jetzt kaufen | $75 | $124.99 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 59.51 | 56.95 |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1183 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,862 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 512 | 640 |
Texturfüllrate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,200 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 640 | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 97 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 400 Watt | 300 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Höhe | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Breite | 2-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 112 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |