AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 843.503
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 24.676
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 24.676 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1183 MHz
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- 1781.7x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 2690
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 476
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 11610
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 33.507
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 3.064
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 140.911
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 4485
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2158
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 4485
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2158
- 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1183 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 2690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 vs 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 vs 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 vs 127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Lexa | GP107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $139 |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 487 |
Price now | $75 | $159.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | 46.07 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 2,138 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |