AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 134 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 1166.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 465
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 9482
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 25.21
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 561.43
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 2.026
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 30.868
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 51.009
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 3426
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 3426

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• 1320.8x better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 2690
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 940
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 2158
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 940
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 2158
• 8.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 127

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 3388
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 465
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 9482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3242
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	127 1106

Compare specifications (specs)