AMD Radeon RX 550 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1183 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 134 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 1166.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 465
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 versus 9482
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 25.21
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 561.43
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 2.026
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 30.868
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 51.009
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 3426
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 3426
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 26 March 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 134 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 versus 9482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 25.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 561.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 2.026 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 30.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 3426 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Environ 66% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 62.7 billion / sec versus 37.86 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 512
- 1320.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,585 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 versus 2690
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 versus 940
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 versus 2158
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 versus 940
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 versus 2158
- 8.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 versus 127
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec versus 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 versus 2690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 versus 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 versus 127 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 3388 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 9482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 25.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 561.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 2.026 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 30.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3242 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 1106 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Lexa | GK106 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 26 March 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | $169 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 810 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,585 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 62.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 134 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 2,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |