AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1020 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 1400x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 11526
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 642.715
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 2.933
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 26.532
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 133.458
• Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 127 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• 1157.5x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2690
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 476
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 33.507
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 4485
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 940
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2158
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 4485
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 940
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	127 117

Compare specifications (specs)