AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 10959
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 10959
- 13.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4223 vs 305
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 30 April 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 10959 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1448 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 3166
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 336
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 38172
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3617
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3617
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1448 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 3166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 38172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3617 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3617 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 | 7881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 564 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38172 | 39165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 | 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 | 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 | 305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 376 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Code name | TU107 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1448 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | |
Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | None |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |