AMD Radeon RX 560 versus NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 81.60 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 512
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 3.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 versus 15667
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 versus 4.039
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 versus 245.081
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1774 versus 1591
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 7 February 2017 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 512 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 versus 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 versus 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 versus 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 versus 1591 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 1090-1175 MHz
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1200-1275 MHz
- 728.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,894 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs
- Environ 70% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 60-80 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4464 versus 3648
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 versus 488
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 versus 56.81
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 versus 775.281
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 versus 64.428
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 versus 6571
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 versus 6571
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 1090-1175 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1200-1275 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 60-80 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4464 versus 3648 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 versus 488 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 versus 56.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 versus 775.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 versus 64.428 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 versus 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 versus 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3688 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3648 | 4464 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 596 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 | 1591 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GP107 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | $375 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 529 | 530 |
Prix maintenant | $104.99 | $319.99 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 54.35 | 15.53 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200-1275 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 14/16 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2.6 TFLOPs | 1,894 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 47 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 170 mm | 145 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |