NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 560

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 1090-1175 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz
• 837.3x better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5373 vs 3646
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 775.281
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 4.602
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 64.428
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 257.062
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6571
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6571
• Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 vs 1809

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

• 1199.6x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 494 vs 355
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 18143
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 vs 54.188
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 3579
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 3579

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5373 3646
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 494
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	18143 57671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.188 56.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1159.046 775.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.507 4.602
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.067 64.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.638 257.062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2219 1809

Compare specifications (specs)