AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 99.6x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13490 vs 8299
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 871 vs 787
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64726 vs 55512
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 vs 141.474
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 13.132
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 112.973
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 vs 799.933
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13621 vs 10141
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13621 vs 10141
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13490 vs 8299 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 vs 787 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64726 vs 55512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 vs 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 vs 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 vs 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2304
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 3560.776
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3358
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 vs 3560.776 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13490 | 8299 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 | 787 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64726 | 55512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 26 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 192 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Design | reference | |
Price now | $849 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 8,900 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 277 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |