AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 6684.5x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 33.6 billion / sec
- 20.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 112
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 65 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 900 MHz
- 29.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13490 vs 454
- 15.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 871 vs 56
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 2845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3304
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 2845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 21 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 33.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 112 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13490 vs 454 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 vs 56 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 150 Watt
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13490 | 454 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 | 56 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64726 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3304 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | G92 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 21 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $160 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 1063 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Price now | $103.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 112 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 33.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 9" (22.9 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |