AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 21188.7x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 10.6 billion / sec
- 16x more pipelines: 2304 vs 144
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
- 16.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13490 vs 811
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 871 vs 203
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64726 vs 12379
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3274
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3274
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 3 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 10.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 144 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13490 vs 811 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 vs 203 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64726 vs 12379 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 150 Watt
Core clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13490 | 811 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 | 203 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64726 | 12379 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | GF106 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 3 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 867 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 144 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 10.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 144 | |
Floating-point performance | 339.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 60.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |