AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 5600M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M

Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8669 vs 7567
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 492 vs 389
Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57191 vs 41946
Around 61% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5888 vs 3667

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	182.2 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8669 vs 7567
PassMark - G2D Mark	492 vs 389
Geekbench - OpenCL	57191 vs 41946
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5888 vs 3667

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1265 MHz
3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11117
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 7694
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11117
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 7694

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Apr 2020 vs 7 Jan 2020
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz vs 1265 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180 vs 11117
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 vs 8904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 vs 7694
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180 vs 11117
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 vs 8904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 vs 7694

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8669

7567

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

492

389

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

57191

41946

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11117

12180

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8904

8926

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7694

8062

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11117

12180

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8904

8926

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7694

8062

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

5888

3667

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	8669	7567
PassMark - G2D Mark	492	389
Geekbench - OpenCL	57191	41946
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11117	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8904	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7694	8062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11117	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8904	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7694	8062
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5888	3667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		644.054

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA	Turing
Code name	Navi 10	TU117
Launch date	7 Jan 2020	2 Apr 2020
Place in performance rating	210	273
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1265 MHz	1485 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Pipelines	2304	1024
Texture fill rate	182.2 GTexel/s	95.04 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	4700 million
Core clock speed		1350 MHz
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance		95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance		6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance		3.041 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate		47.52 GPixel/s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12	12.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenCL		1.2
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6