AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3718
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3355
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3718
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3355
- Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1320 vs 1061
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 22 February 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1320 vs 1061 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12900 vs 8845
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 486
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61100 vs 55534
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 11117
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 11117
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 vs 8845 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 486 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 vs 55534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 11117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 11117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8845 | 12900 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 | 807 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55534 | 61100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1320 | 1061 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 22 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 238 | 221 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 6,600 million |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5600M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
AMDRadeon VII
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
IntelArc A310
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
AMDRadeon 780M
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
AMDRadeon 740M
