AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3719
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3361
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3719
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3361 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 182.2 GTexel/s
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10980 vs 8817
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 499 vs 487
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63726 vs 55515
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 11117
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 11117
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 182.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10980 vs 8817 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 499 vs 487 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63726 vs 55515 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 11117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8817 | 10980 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 499 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55515 | 63726 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 14496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 14496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1320 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | N19E-Q1 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 241 | 244 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 198.7 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 10800 million |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | Large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |