AMD Radeon RX 560D vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 65.8 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- 1755x better floating-point performance: 2,106 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 940
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 940
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2158
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2158
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 2158 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1090 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1175 MHz
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1090 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 1175 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 2158 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560D | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Lexa |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $79 |
Place in performance rating | 703 | 876 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Price now | $75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 1.2 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 170 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |