AMD Radeon RX 560D vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 5.5x more core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 6.3x more texture fill rate: 65.8 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 22.4x more pipelines: 896 vs 40
- 20.3x better floating-point performance: 2,106 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3285
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1175 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 65 Watt
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1175 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5081 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560D | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 27 May 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Place in performance rating | 733 | 644 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |