AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 944 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 1108.7x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 73.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20572 vs 14467
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 345
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 9 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 944 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 73.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 vs 14467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 345 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- 905.8x better floating-point performance: 2,355 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3821 vs 3168
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1831 vs 1826 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3821 vs 3168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 | 1831 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 | 14467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 345 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3168 | 3821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 720.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.903 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Baffin | GM204 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 9 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 666 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 950 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 944 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 2,355 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 73.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |