AMD Radeon RX 560X vs AMD Radeon R9 380
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 970 MHz
- 751.4x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 7.2x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 vs 654
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 vs 3718
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 vs 3718
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 vs 654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 vs 3718 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
- 1336.9x better floating-point performance: 3,476 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7635 vs 5698
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7635 vs 5698
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6119 vs 3553
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 16461
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 3,476 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 vs 5698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 vs 5698 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6119 vs 3553 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 vs 16461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5698 | 7635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5698 | 7635 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 | 654 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3553 | 6119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16461 | 76397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2793 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X | AMD Radeon R9 380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Antigua |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 390 | 387 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $264.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 970 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 3,476 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 108.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 190 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 221 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2 x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 970 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |