AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2047.7x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 5918
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 323
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 vs 20732
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 75.758
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 vs 843.503
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 5.071
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 24.676
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 301.168
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 8496
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 8496
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 5918 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 vs 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 vs 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 vs 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
- 487.8x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3624
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3624
- 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 880
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 3624 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 vs 880 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 5918 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP106B |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 February 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 405 | 533 |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 2,488 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 77.76 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |