AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • 1681.1x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 6932
  • Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36141 vs 22533
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 6.736
  • Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 417.823
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3316
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3316
  • Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3864 vs 2958
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 6 February 2017
Texture fill rate 159.23 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2048 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 16 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6967 vs 6932
Geekbench - OpenCL 36141 vs 22533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251 vs 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520.089 vs 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3864 vs 2958

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
  • Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
  • 594.3x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 644 vs 626
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 105.688
  • Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 1083.926
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 79.029
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9172
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3624
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9172
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3624
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1076 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
Boost clock speed 1480 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 7000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 644 vs 626
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 113.416 vs 105.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1414.794 vs 1083.926
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 81.206 vs 79.029
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10251 vs 9172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3681 vs 3624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10251 vs 9172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3681 vs 3624

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6967
6932
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
626
644
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
36141
22533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
105.688
113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1083.926
1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.251
6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
79.029
81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
520.089
417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9172
10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3624
3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9172
10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3624
3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3864
2958
Name AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA Quadro P2000
PassMark - G3D Mark 6967 6932
PassMark - G2D Mark 626 644
Geekbench - OpenCL 36141 22533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1083.926 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.029 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520.089 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9172 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3624 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9172 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3624 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3864 2958

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Pascal
Code name Polaris 20 GP106
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch date 18 April 2017 6 February 2017
Launch price (MSRP) $169 $585
Place in performance rating 396 393
Price now $149.99 $429.99
Type Desktop, Laptop Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 59.00 19.44

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1206-1244 MHz 1480 MHz
Core clock speed 926-1168 MHz 1076 MHz
Floating-point performance 5.1 TFLOPs 3,031 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 16 nm
Pipelines 2048 768
Pixel fill rate 39.81 GP/s
Render output units 32
Stream Processors 2048
Texture fill rate 159.23 GTexel/s 94.72 GTexel / s
Texture Units 128
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 4,400 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 4x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bridgeless CrossFire
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm 201 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 450 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 5 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 140.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz 7008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
CrossFire
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)