AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• 1681.1x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 6926
• Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35108 vs 22897
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 6.736
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 417.823
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3316
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3316
• Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3858 vs 2958

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
• 594.3x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 626
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 105.688
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 1083.926
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 79.029
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9172
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3624
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9172
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3624

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6967 6926
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	626 634
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	35108 22897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	105.688 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1083.926 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.251 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.029 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	520.089 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9172 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3624 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9172 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3624 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3858 2958

Compare specifications (specs)