AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 248.4 GT/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14341 vs 13504
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 878 vs 847
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66313 vs 47476
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 150.951
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 1718.593
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 12.283
- 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 28.289
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 710.366
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3340
- Around 72% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1862 vs 1082
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 10 June 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 248.4 GT/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14341 vs 13504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 878 vs 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66313 vs 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1862 vs 1082 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1465 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 11536
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 11536
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1465 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 11536 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14341 | 13504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 878 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66313 | 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1862 | 1082 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP104 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 10 June 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $379 |
Place in performance rating | 201 | 288 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 248.4 GT/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1920 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 500 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |