AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 71.4x lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 12500 million
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3947
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3947
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 10411
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 10411
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 19 March 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 12500 million |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 10411 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 675
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 8525
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 5140
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 5140
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 675 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 vs 8525 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 5140 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 | 784 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8525 | 11300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 10411 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Vega 10 PRO |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Greenland |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 19 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 227 | 230 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | 499.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 12500 million |
Transistor count | 5700 million | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |