AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 1822.9x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3698
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3698
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3340
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3340
- 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1001 vs 369
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 19 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1001 vs 369 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 148 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 687
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 8457
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 5140
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 5140
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 687 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 vs 8457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 5140 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 | 766 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8457 | 9640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1001 | 369 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GM204 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 228 | 371 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Price now | $407.76 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 148 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1664 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 500 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pins |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |