AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 1056.4x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 1000x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 603
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 vs 1718.593
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.352 vs 12.283
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 28.289
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 vs 710.366
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3340
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1469 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1545 MHz
• 949x better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 9374
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47476 vs 45591
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 vs 137.469
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 13383
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 13383
• 5.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5536 vs 1081

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9374 10465
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	789 603
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	45591 47476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	137.469 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2083.862 1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.352 12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.477 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	762.142 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13383 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13383 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1081 5536

Compare specifications (specs)