AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- 507.5x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- 59.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 57
- 59.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 57
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 vs 27 March 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- 1975.9x better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 45611
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19081 vs 13383
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19081 vs 13383
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 vs 45611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 vs 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 vs 13383 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9390 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45611 | 131696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 57 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4758 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Volta |
Code name | Polaris 30 | GV100 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 271 | 272 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | 14,029 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 21,100 million |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |